Soundcheck: Sgt. Pepper at 40
I stumbled onto this fantastic radio debate between my favorite NY Times music critic Allan Kozinn and the Chicago Sun-Times candidly brilliant man-of-rock Jim DeRogatis. The matter-at-hand was Sgt. Pepper and its spot atop the rock canon: is it well-deserved or misplaced? I'm firmly with Kozinn in that it's a masterpiece, mostly because the music sounds great to me. I'm not from the LP generation, but if I were, I'd say it's pretty tough to beat side B and its whimsical progression towards "A Day in the Life." (Yes, I even think "Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite" is excellent in every way, even if it does say nothing.) That said, DeRogatis mostly blames McCartney's lyrical kitchiness (see "She's Leaving Home" and "When I'm 64") for the album's faults when, considering the record's special place and time, could've said so much more. (Does DeRogatis want more songs appropo to the Summer of Love, ala The Youngbloods "Get Together" ?) He also claims that most Beatles fans would acknowledge that Revolver is the band's preeminent recording, and of course it's hard for me to argue against that. But does "Good Day Sunshine" and "Yellow Submarine" differ that much in sentiment from Pepper's perceived fluff? If Pepper and Revolver traded "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" and "I'm only Sleeping" with each other, then Pepper would be far easier to claim as the greatest pop/rock record ever made. Sorry Julian.

